{
  "system_prefix": null,
  "history_count": 1,
  "user_summary": {
    "text": "请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。分治算法将问题拆分为更小的子问题，分别求解后再合并结果，与递归天然契合。斐波那契",
    "has_image": false,
    "has_tool_result": false
  },
  "assistant_summary": {
    "text": "归并排序的时间复杂度为：\n\n\\[\n\\Theta(n \\log n)\n\\]\n\n更具体地说，最好、平均、最坏情况下都是：\n\n\\[\nO(n \\log n)\n\\]\n\n---\n\n## 1. 为什么是 \\(O(n \\log n)\\)\n\n归并排序采用分治思想：\n\n1. 将数组分成左右两半；\n2. 递归排序左半部分",
    "tool_calls": [],
    "stop_reason": "length"
  }
}

Method: POST

URL: https://ark.cn-beijing.volces.com/api/v3/chat/completions

Headers:
{
  "authorization": "Bearer ark-f137c261-ce2c-4ac5-b065-fafb2270c3d7-1801e",
  "content-type": "application/json"
}

Body:
{
  "max_tokens": 300,
  "messages": [
    {
      "content": "请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。分治算法将问题拆分为更小的子问题，分别求解后再合并结果，与递归天然契合。斐波那契数列中每个数字是前两个数字之和，用递归实现时需要注意重复计算问题。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。",
      "role": "user"
    }
  ],
  "model": "deepseek-v4-pro-ga-260813",
  "stream": false
}

Headers:
{
  "content-length": "10064",
  "content-type": "application/json; charset=utf-8",
  "date": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:44:14 GMT",
  "server": "istio-envoy",
  "vary": "Accept-Encoding",
  "x-client-request-id": "unknown-20260830234341-AkHPDBII",
  "x-envoy-upstream-service-time": "34447",
  "x-request-id": "021788104620962640844006c495b97e3327b5d9afec856257de6"
}

Body:
{
  "choices": [
    {
      "finish_reason": "length",
      "index": 0,
      "logprobs": null,
      "message": {
        "content": "归并排序的时间复杂度为：\n\n\\[\n\\Theta(n \\log n)\n\\]\n\n更具体地说，最好、平均、最坏情况下都是：\n\n\\[\nO(n \\log n)\n\\]\n\n---\n\n## 1. 为什么是 \\(O(n \\log n)\\)\n\n归并排序采用分治思想：\n\n1. 将数组分成左右两半；\n2. 递归排序左半部分和右半部分；\n3. 将两个有序子数组合并成一个有序数组。\n\n设对长度为 \\(n\\) 的数组排序所需时间为 \\(T(n)\\)，则有递推关系：\n\n\\[\nT(n) = 2T\\left(\\frac{n}{2}\\right) + O(n)\n\\]\n\n其中：\n\n- \\(2T(n/2)\\)：左右两个子问题，每个规模为 \\(n/2\\)；\n- \\(O(n)\\)：合并两个有序子数组所需时间。\n\n---\n\n## 2. 递归树分析\n\n每一层递归的总合并时间为：\n\n- 第 0 层：\\(O(n)\\)\n- 第 1 层：两个 \\(n/2\\) 的合并，总时间 \\(O(n)\\)\n- 第 2 层：四个 \\(n/4\\) 的合并，总时间 \\(O(n)\\)\n\n递归深度为：\n\n\\[\n\\log_2 n\n\\]\n\n因此总时间为：\n\n\\[\nO(n) \\times O(\\log n) = O(n \\log n)\n\\]\n\n",
        "reasoning_content": "我们需要回答用户中文问题。用户说“请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。分治算法将问题拆分为更小的子问题，分别求解后再合并结果，与递归天然契合。斐波那契数列中每个数字是前两个数字之和，用递归实现时需要注意重复计算问题。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。”\n\n这段有点杂乱，重复。核心是“请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。” 后面可能是上下文或需要全部说明？用户要求“请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。” 可能只需要说明归并排序的时间复杂度。但后面列举递归相关概念，可能希望解释归并排序时间复杂度以及递归相关？ 需要解析。\n\n用户文本：“请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。分治算法将问题拆分为更小的子问题，分别求解后再合并结果，与递归天然契合。斐波那契数列中每个数字是前两个数字之和，用递归实现时需要注意重复计算问题。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。”\n\n可能是题目要求“说明归并排序的时间复杂度”，后面是一些陈述，可能是要求从这些概念中选？ Maybe user pasted multiple sentences from notes, asks \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。\" Only first sentence is question. Need answer detailed about merge sort time complexity. Could also mention recursive divide-and-conquer context, best/average/worst O(n log n), space O(n), recurrence T(n)=2T(n/2)+O(n), master theorem. Need maybe compare with DFS, backtracking? Hmm.\n\nLet's answer in Chinese, detailed. Need satisfy \"详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度\". We can include:\n- 归并排序采用分治法：分割（O(1) or O(log n) if recursive call overhead), 合并 O(n).\n- Recurrence: T(n)=2T(n/2)+cn, T(1)=0.\n- Solve by recursive tree: each level total cn, levels log2 n, total cn log2 n => O(n log n).\n- Or Master theorem a=2,b=2,f(n)=O(n), c_crit=1, f(n)=Theta(n^{1}) => T(n)=Theta(n log n).\n- Best, average, worst all Θ(n log n). Because divide is independent of input data distribution; merge always scans all elements.\n- Space: auxiliary O(n) for temp arrays, recursion stack O(log n), total O(n). In linked list in-place maybe O(1) auxiliary? But standard array merge sort O(n).\n- Stability, etc maybe.\n- Compare with naive O(n^2) sorts.\n- Mention if using bottom-up merge sort also O(n log n).\nNeed maybe include proof details.\n\nThe user also repeated information about DFS, decision trees, Fibonacci, backtracking. Maybe perhaps they want \"说明归并排序的时间复杂度\" in context with other recursive algorithms? The phrase \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。\" likely isolated. I can answer specifically. Maybe also maybe there is a hidden ask: \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。...\" They might be testing if I can organize all? Hmm.\n\nLet's read: \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。分治算法将问题拆分为更小的子问题，分别求解后再合并结果，与递归天然契合。斐波那契数列中每个数字是前两个数字之和，用递归实现时需要注意重复计算问题。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。\"\n\nIt's like they wrote \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。\" then maybe after that are notes from some source about recursion. Maybe they expect a response to all statements? But the explicit ask is only about merge sort. The rest may be context, maybe no direct question. Could perhaps structure answer:\n1. 归并排序时间复杂度 (focused)\n2. 与递归/分治的关系\n3. 对比其他提到的递归算法 maybe not necessary.\nNeed decide.\n\nGiven \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。\" I will answer that thoroughly. At the end maybe say \"如果还想讨论后面列出的 DFS、决策树、斐波那契、回溯等递归/分治算法的时间复杂度或关系，可以继续问\" maybe useful. But no.\n\nNeed include mathematical notation Chinese. Use formula.\n\nLet's draft:\n\n归并排序：\n- 基本操作：将数组分成两半，递归排序左/右子数组，然后将两个有序子数组合并。\n- 设 n 个元素，T(n) worst-case time:\n  T(n) = 2T(n/2) + O(n) for n>1; T(1)=O(1).\n- Explanation: 2T(n/2) two recursive calls on size n/2; O(n) merging two sorted subarrays of total n using two pointers.\n- Solve:\n  - Recursion tree: root cost cn, next level two nodes size n/2, total cn, ..., kth level 2^k*(c n/2^k)=cn. number levels until size 1: log2 n. Total cn log2 n. So Θ(n log n).\n  - Master theorem: a=2,b=2,f(n)=Θ(n); n^{log_b a}=n^1=n, f(n)=Θ(n^{1}) so case 2 -> T(n)=Θ(n log n).\n- Therefore best/average/worst all Θ(n log n), not dependent on input order (unless optimization for sorted? Maybe base comparisons maybe still merge; sometimes optimized merge sort can skip merging if last left <= first right, best O(n) for nearly sorted? But classic merge sort is always O(n log n). Need mention if naive/classic is Θ(n log n). Some optimized can detect already sorted runs for best O(n), but typical analysis O(n log n).\n- Space: array temp O(n). Recursion stack O(log n). total O(n).\n- Stability and summary.\n\nNeed maybe include \"为什么不是 O(n^2)\" because divide halves guarantee depth log n and merge linear.\n\nNeed be \"详细回答\" maybe include \"分解阶段不实际移动元素，只计算中间下标 O(1) per call; but in total across recursion creates O(n log n) calls? Wait the number of recursive calls? Let's be precise: Division step per call O(1), there are O(n) nodes in recursion tree? Actually internal nodes n-1, leaves n. Total division overhead O(n). But merge dominates O(n log n). We can mention.\n\nPotential pitfalls: Some might say T(n)=2T(n/2)+O(n) resolves to O(n log n). Need avoid \"log2 n levels\" if n not power of two: asymptotically ignoring floors/ceilings. mention.\n\nLet's produce final in Chinese. Maybe start with \"归并排序的时间复杂度为...\" then detailed.\n\nNeed maybe include \"递归实现与迭代实现相同，时间复杂度都是 O(n log n)\".\nCould also mention \"比较次数\" lower bound? Merge sort achieves asymptotically optimal for comparison sorts.\n\nLet's craft final with headings maybe.\n\nUser specifically in Chinese. Answer in Chinese.\n\nNeed maybe include \"空间复杂度\" although question about time; include.\n\nLet's prepare final answer.\n\nFinal should be concise but detailed.\n\nLet's output:\n\n归并排序时间复杂度：\n\n- 最坏、平均、最好：均为 Θ(n log n)\n- 递推式...\n- 递归树...\n- Master theorem...\n- 原因...\n- 空间复杂度 O(n)\n\nNeed perhaps address repeated statements? Hmm maybe not. Could add \"它也是分治与递归的典型代表；你提到的 DFS/回溯等也是递归，但复杂度分析不同\" maybe in one sentence.\n\nLet's formulate nicely.\n\n",
        "role": "assistant"
      }
    }
  ],
  "created": 1788104655,
  "id": "021788104620962640844006c495b97e3327b5d9afec856257de6",
  "model": "deepseek-v4-pro-ga-260813",
  "service_tier": "default",
  "object": "chat.completion",
  "usage": {
    "completion_tokens": 2226,
    "prompt_tokens": 234,
    "total_tokens": 2460,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0
    },
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1925
    }
  }
}

{
  "completion_tokens": 2226,
  "completion_tokens_details": {
    "reasoning_tokens": 1925
  },
  "prompt_tokens": 234,
  "prompt_tokens_details": {
    "cached_tokens": 0
  },
  "total_tokens": 2460
}

Method: POST

URL: /v1/chat/completions

Headers:
{
  "accept": "*/*",
  "accept-encoding": "gzip",
  "authorization": "Bearer sk_r4gAXloJQt74Cp4prb19OItKzoG77lLhjmWT4ei20Ua",
  "content-length": "845",
  "content-type": "application/json",
  "host": "api.tokendiet.cn",
  "user-agent": "Go-http-client/2.0",
  "via": "2.0 Caddy",
  "x-forwarded-for": "13.212.110.206",
  "x-forwarded-host": "api.tokendiet.cn",
  "x-forwarded-proto": "https"
}

Body:
{
  "model": "deepseek-v4-pro-g2",
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。分治算法将问题拆分为更小的子问题，分别求解后再合并结果，与递归天然契合。斐波那契数列中每个数字是前两个数字之和，用递归实现时需要注意重复计算问题。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。"
    }
  ],
  "stream": false,
  "max_tokens": 300
}

Body:
{
  "choices": [
    {
      "finish_reason": "length",
      "index": 0,
      "logprobs": null,
      "message": {
        "content": "归并排序的时间复杂度为：\n\n\\[\n\\Theta(n \\log n)\n\\]\n\n更具体地说，最好、平均、最坏情况下都是：\n\n\\[\nO(n \\log n)\n\\]\n\n---\n\n## 1. 为什么是 \\(O(n \\log n)\\)\n\n归并排序采用分治思想：\n\n1. 将数组分成左右两半；\n2. 递归排序左半部分和右半部分；\n3. 将两个有序子数组合并成一个有序数组。\n\n设对长度为 \\(n\\) 的数组排序所需时间为 \\(T(n)\\)，则有递推关系：\n\n\\[\nT(n) = 2T\\left(\\frac{n}{2}\\right) + O(n)\n\\]\n\n其中：\n\n- \\(2T(n/2)\\)：左右两个子问题，每个规模为 \\(n/2\\)；\n- \\(O(n)\\)：合并两个有序子数组所需时间。\n\n---\n\n## 2. 递归树分析\n\n每一层递归的总合并时间为：\n\n- 第 0 层：\\(O(n)\\)\n- 第 1 层：两个 \\(n/2\\) 的合并，总时间 \\(O(n)\\)\n- 第 2 层：四个 \\(n/4\\) 的合并，总时间 \\(O(n)\\)\n\n递归深度为：\n\n\\[\n\\log_2 n\n\\]\n\n因此总时间为：\n\n\\[\nO(n) \\times O(\\log n) = O(n \\log n)\n\\]\n\n",
        "reasoning_content": "我们需要回答用户中文问题。用户说“请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。分治算法将问题拆分为更小的子问题，分别求解后再合并结果，与递归天然契合。斐波那契数列中每个数字是前两个数字之和，用递归实现时需要注意重复计算问题。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。”\n\n这段有点杂乱，重复。核心是“请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。” 后面可能是上下文或需要全部说明？用户要求“请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。” 可能只需要说明归并排序的时间复杂度。但后面列举递归相关概念，可能希望解释归并排序时间复杂度以及递归相关？ 需要解析。\n\n用户文本：“请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。分治算法将问题拆分为更小的子问题，分别求解后再合并结果，与递归天然契合。斐波那契数列中每个数字是前两个数字之和，用递归实现时需要注意重复计算问题。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。”\n\n可能是题目要求“说明归并排序的时间复杂度”，后面是一些陈述，可能是要求从这些概念中选？ Maybe user pasted multiple sentences from notes, asks \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。\" Only first sentence is question. Need answer detailed about merge sort time complexity. Could also mention recursive divide-and-conquer context, best/average/worst O(n log n), space O(n), recurrence T(n)=2T(n/2)+O(n), master theorem. Need maybe compare with DFS, backtracking? Hmm.\n\nLet's answer in Chinese, detailed. Need satisfy \"详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度\". We can include:\n- 归并排序采用分治法：分割（O(1) or O(log n) if recursive call overhead), 合并 O(n).\n- Recurrence: T(n)=2T(n/2)+cn, T(1)=0.\n- Solve by recursive tree: each level total cn, levels log2 n, total cn log2 n => O(n log n).\n- Or Master theorem a=2,b=2,f(n)=O(n), c_crit=1, f(n)=Theta(n^{1}) => T(n)=Theta(n log n).\n- Best, average, worst all Θ(n log n). Because divide is independent of input data distribution; merge always scans all elements.\n- Space: auxiliary O(n) for temp arrays, recursion stack O(log n), total O(n). In linked list in-place maybe O(1) auxiliary? But standard array merge sort O(n).\n- Stability, etc maybe.\n- Compare with naive O(n^2) sorts.\n- Mention if using bottom-up merge sort also O(n log n).\nNeed maybe include proof details.\n\nThe user also repeated information about DFS, decision trees, Fibonacci, backtracking. Maybe perhaps they want \"说明归并排序的时间复杂度\" in context with other recursive algorithms? The phrase \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。\" likely isolated. I can answer specifically. Maybe also maybe there is a hidden ask: \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。...\" They might be testing if I can organize all? Hmm.\n\nLet's read: \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。机器学习中的决策树构建过程也涉及递归，不断对数据子集进行划分。图的深度优先搜索使用递归或显式栈实现，用于遍历或检测连通性。分治算法将问题拆分为更小的子问题，分别求解后再合并结果，与递归天然契合。斐波那契数列中每个数字是前两个数字之和，用递归实现时需要注意重复计算问题。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。回溯算法本质上是在递归搜索树上进行深度优先遍历，遇到死路就回退。\"\n\nIt's like they wrote \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。\" then maybe after that are notes from some source about recursion. Maybe they expect a response to all statements? But the explicit ask is only about merge sort. The rest may be context, maybe no direct question. Could perhaps structure answer:\n1. 归并排序时间复杂度 (focused)\n2. 与递归/分治的关系\n3. 对比其他提到的递归算法 maybe not necessary.\nNeed decide.\n\nGiven \"请详细回答：说明归并排序的时间复杂度。\" I will answer that thoroughly. At the end maybe say \"如果还想讨论后面列出的 DFS、决策树、斐波那契、回溯等递归/分治算法的时间复杂度或关系，可以继续问\" maybe useful. But no.\n\nNeed include mathematical notation Chinese. Use formula.\n\nLet's draft:\n\n归并排序：\n- 基本操作：将数组分成两半，递归排序左/右子数组，然后将两个有序子数组合并。\n- 设 n 个元素，T(n) worst-case time:\n  T(n) = 2T(n/2) + O(n) for n>1; T(1)=O(1).\n- Explanation: 2T(n/2) two recursive calls on size n/2; O(n) merging two sorted subarrays of total n using two pointers.\n- Solve:\n  - Recursion tree: root cost cn, next level two nodes size n/2, total cn, ..., kth level 2^k*(c n/2^k)=cn. number levels until size 1: log2 n. Total cn log2 n. So Θ(n log n).\n  - Master theorem: a=2,b=2,f(n)=Θ(n); n^{log_b a}=n^1=n, f(n)=Θ(n^{1}) so case 2 -> T(n)=Θ(n log n).\n- Therefore best/average/worst all Θ(n log n), not dependent on input order (unless optimization for sorted? Maybe base comparisons maybe still merge; sometimes optimized merge sort can skip merging if last left <= first right, best O(n) for nearly sorted? But classic merge sort is always O(n log n). Need mention if naive/classic is Θ(n log n). Some optimized can detect already sorted runs for best O(n), but typical analysis O(n log n).\n- Space: array temp O(n). Recursion stack O(log n). total O(n).\n- Stability and summary.\n\nNeed maybe include \"为什么不是 O(n^2)\" because divide halves guarantee depth log n and merge linear.\n\nNeed be \"详细回答\" maybe include \"分解阶段不实际移动元素，只计算中间下标 O(1) per call; but in total across recursion creates O(n log n) calls? Wait the number of recursive calls? Let's be precise: Division step per call O(1), there are O(n) nodes in recursion tree? Actually internal nodes n-1, leaves n. Total division overhead O(n). But merge dominates O(n log n). We can mention.\n\nPotential pitfalls: Some might say T(n)=2T(n/2)+O(n) resolves to O(n log n). Need avoid \"log2 n levels\" if n not power of two: asymptotically ignoring floors/ceilings. mention.\n\nLet's produce final in Chinese. Maybe start with \"归并排序的时间复杂度为...\" then detailed.\n\nNeed maybe include \"递归实现与迭代实现相同，时间复杂度都是 O(n log n)\".\nCould also mention \"比较次数\" lower bound? Merge sort achieves asymptotically optimal for comparison sorts.\n\nLet's craft final with headings maybe.\n\nUser specifically in Chinese. Answer in Chinese.\n\nNeed maybe include \"空间复杂度\" although question about time; include.\n\nLet's prepare final answer.\n\nFinal should be concise but detailed.\n\nLet's output:\n\n归并排序时间复杂度：\n\n- 最坏、平均、最好：均为 Θ(n log n)\n- 递推式...\n- 递归树...\n- Master theorem...\n- 原因...\n- 空间复杂度 O(n)\n\nNeed perhaps address repeated statements? Hmm maybe not. Could add \"它也是分治与递归的典型代表；你提到的 DFS/回溯等也是递归，但复杂度分析不同\" maybe in one sentence.\n\nLet's formulate nicely.\n\n",
        "role": "assistant"
      }
    }
  ],
  "created": 1788104655,
  "id": "021788104620962640844006c495b97e3327b5d9afec856257de6",
  "model": "deepseek-v4-pro-g2",
  "object": "chat.completion",
  "service_tier": "default",
  "usage": {
    "completion_tokens": 2226,
    "completion_tokens_details": {
      "reasoning_tokens": 1925
    },
    "prompt_tokens": 234,
    "prompt_tokens_details": {
      "cached_tokens": 0
    },
    "total_tokens": 2460
  }
}